Shifting careers
The future saw artificial intelligence replace human beings in many jobs, and so a different idea of work and money started to appear. Anton Gildenhuys, Chief Actuary and Group Risk Officer of Sanlam, has considered the trends that indicated people would live longer, concluding that a person would have to quadruple their amount of work in a society where jobs would become scarce.
During her 200-year life span, Lesedi had to switch from a linear to a cyclical way of living by completely shifting her assumptions about having a stable career and pension fund. She would study, work hard for a few decades and then take a mini-retirement to relax, travel, and visit family (but never for long periods of time). Lesedi discovered that if she left the working environment for too long, she would be left behind by rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and their ever-evolving role in the working world.
But what does a longer working life mean for the next generation? Would staying in top-tier jobs for longer leave our youth struggling to find opportunities to grow their wealth? Episode 2 also introduced Cebisa Ndaba, a writer and leading activist from 2118, who argued against life extension, believing it to be the ultimate act of selfishness, as generations to follow would have to compete for the little resources and jobs that were left. She was not only a powerful voice for the movement, but also Lesedi’s youngest child from her first marriage.
What Cebisa failed to predict is that preventative medicine and preventative maintenance would gradually reduce the burden of welfare costs. As the pharmaceutical industry shifted, money began to trickle into other aspects of the economy, increasing opportunities for future generations – a phenomenon known as the longevity dividend.